NOTE:
Although I do a comparison between Oklahoma LLCs and Nevada corporations here, there are other states (such as New Mexico, Missouri and Indiana) that also have very favorable LLC laws.
However, their characteristics will vary slightly from that of Oklahoma LLCs, and I form different LLCs in different states depending on a client’s state of residency, goals, needs, and other circumstances.
This document shows the various pros and cons of using Oklahoma LLCs as opposed to Nevada Corporations.
See for yourself which entity is better suited to your needs.
PROS: | PROS: |
Oklahoma LLC | Nevada Corporation |
|
|
CONS: | CONS: |
|
|
Footnotes
i Oklahoma Statutes, §18-2005(A)(2).
ii O.S. §18-2005. Note that in O.S. §18-2006, the Articles of Organization need not be signed by a member or manager of the company.
iii O.S. §18-2055(1).
iv O.S. §18-2005(A)(2).
v O.S. §18-2021(D). An operating agreement may also specify that the LLCs company records are not required to be kept at its principle address.
vi O.S. §18-2055.2.
vii O.S. §18-2034.
viii O.S. §18-2017.
ix IRS ILM 199930013, April 18th, 1999. This ILM was written by Kathryn A. Zuba, who at the time was the Chief of General Litigation of the IRS.
x See IRS form 8832 and 2553 instructions. For information on the tax treatment of a single member LLC (an entity disregarded from its member for tax purposes) or a Disregarded Entity Multi-Member LLC (DEMMLLC), see IRS Rev. Ruling 2004-77.
xi IRS Rev. Ruling 2004-77.
xii In re: Ashley Albright, Case No. 01-11367, U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the district of Colorado.
xiii IRS Rev. Ruling 2004-77.
xiv To read a court discussion on how a corporation’s limited liability veil may be pierced, see Garcia v. Coffman, 124 N.M. 12, 946 P.2d 216 (N.M.App. 06/17/1997). An excellent article that discusses how an LLC may be pierced is Piercing the Veil of a Michigan Limited Liability Company, by James R Cambridge, Esq. This document may be found online at http://www.michbar.org/business/pdfs/fall2003/Cambridge.pdf
xv O.S. §18-2013(A).
xvi Title 26 U.S.C. §732(b).
xvii NRS 78.060(d)
xviii NRS 78.105(1)(c).
xix See IRS form 2553 instructions.
xx See IRS form 1099-MISC instructions, pp. MISC1-2.
xxi See IRS form SS-4 instructions, p. 3.
xxii See the instructions for IRS forms 1120, 1120S, and 1065, respectively.
xxiii Title 26 U.S.C. § 6041A.
xxiv O.S. §18-2034.
xxv NRS 78.035(4).
xxvi Per the U.F.T.A. At the time of this writing, 40 states have adopted the U.F.T.A. The remaining states have written their own version of fraudulent transfer law.
xxvii To read a court discussion on how a corporation’s limited liability veil may be pierced, see Garcia v. Coffman, 124 N.M. 12, 946 P.2d 216 (N.M.App. 06/17/1997).
xxviii NRS 78.747(2)(a)(b).
xxix NRS 78.747(1).
xxx Delaware Code Title 8 (Corporations), §325(b).
xxxi See IRS form 2553 instructions, p. 1.
xxxii Title 26 U.S.C. §§301, 311, 331, 336.
xxxiii NRS 360.760-360.795.